Home Adjudication

Adjudication

Adjudicator and its Process

Adjudicator and its ProcessWhat is an Adjudicator?

An adjudicator is someone, typically of rank or a legal professional, who presides, arbitrates and ultimately judges over a formal dispute. As a term, adjudicator in essence, means to “judge”, without invoking the legal term.

An example of an adjudicator is an individual who offers a preliminary ruling or judgment to resolve a legal dispute. The majority of adjudicators will work on non-violent or civil claims to resolve matters such as unemployment insurance claims or monetary squabbles between public bodies and individual citizens.

An adjudicator will make an initial ruling to resolve these sorts of matters to keep the case from further entering the court system. The adjudication process is therefore recommended for a number of civil disputes, because the legal process is less costly and far more streamlined than other judicial forms, such as a trial by jury.

Although an adjudicator’s judgment does not hold the same legal weight as a judge or jury presiding in a traditional legal venue, the decision is still rendered like a judge and does hold a legally binding resolution. Furthermore, all cases heard and decided by an adjudicator may be appealed to a judge in a higher court setting. That being said, an adjudicator’s decision is typically accepted as the same as what a traditional judge would offer—this characteristic prevents many time-consuming legal matters from creating a log-jam in the court system.

An adjudicator is also a term used to describe a panel of judges who are grouped together during the process of negotiating or receiving a Top Secret/SCI clearance for the United States government. In this format, an adjudicator will serve on a panel to review all of the information from a background investigation and polygraph tests to render a decision regarding the approval or rejection of government clearance.

What does the Adjudication Process Entail?

Adjudication refers to the formal legal process by which an adjudicator reviews evidence and testimonies (including legal reasoning offered by litigants or opposing parties) to come to a decision. This decision ultimately determines the distribution of rights and obligations for the parties involved in the legal dispute. Adjudication is distinct from other justice-seeking or evidence-based resolution formats; in particular, the process is only used to solve the following types of disputes:

Disputes between private parties, such as individual citizens or corporations (who possess a legal personality)

Disputes that arise between public officials and private parties

Disputes between public bodies and public officials

Adjudication occurs when a natural person, typically someone empowered by an agency to formalize a binding decision, is given the task of examining evidence or facts to render a legally-acceptable and affirmed judgment. As a result of this process and the broad definition attached, adjudication may refer to a casual form of judging, such as in athletic competitions, where a body of judges adjudicate and awards scores to the competitors; or adjudication may  occur in business, where a qualified judge is called to examine the facts to resolve a dispute between two parties.

Adjudication, in the majority of cases, is binding and does not require the inclusion of a jury to render a decision in a civil trial. In the adjudication process, a judge will render a decision regarding the case only after all the evidence has been presented to the presiding body. This legal process is preferred by a number of institutions and individuals in the midst of a legal battle because is typically less expensive than a trial case and is far more expedient.

What does “Adjudicated” Mean?

What does What is the meaning of Adjudication?

Adjudication is a legal process that aims to expedite the delivery of resolutions or punishments to squabbling parties. The result of the adjudication process is a legally-binding judgment; the stipulations and demands of the judgment are legally upheld by a local or federal governing body.

The adjudicated meaning simply refers to the formal legal process by which a judge or arbiter reviews evidence (including legal reasoning offered by litigants or opposing parties) to come to a decision in a legal matter. Typically the cases heard in adjudication setting revolve around disputes over money or non-violent infractions. Regardless of the legal matter at hand, all decisions rendered in the adjudication process will ultimately determine the distribution of rights and obligations for the parties involved. Adjudication is distinct from other justice-seeking or evidence-based resolution formats; in particular, the process is only used to solve the following types of disputes:

Disputes between private parties, such as individual citizens or corporations (who possess a legal personality)

Disputes that arise between public officials and private parties

Disputes between public bodies and public officials

Who is involved in the Adjudication Process?

Adjudication occurs when a natural person, typically someone empowered by an agency, to formalize a binding decision, is given the task of examining evidence or facts to render a legally-acceptable and affirmed judgment.

Adjudication, in the majority of cases, is binding and does not require the inclusion of a jury to render a decision in a civil trial. In the adjudication process, a judge will render a decision regarding the case only after all the evidence has been presented to the presiding official. This legal process is preferred by a number of institutions and individuals in the midst of a legal battle because it is typically less expensive than a trial case and far more expedient.

As stated earlier, a judge (instead of a jury) will typically settle disputes between parties involved in an adjudication process. Although the adjudication process is quicker and typically less expensive, the review of facts is generally thought to be less thorough and sympathetic when compared to a trial by jury. In the legal sense, an adjudicator is not regarded as a mediatory, even though the two parties are required to come to terms or agree on a settlement to resolve a case.

In the majority of situations, a mediator will help find a compromise between feuding parties, but they cannot force the parties to do so. In contrast, the legal adjudication process and the settlement it reaches, does require the parties involved to comply to the punishments or settlements outlined; the resolution the legal adjudication process reaches is legal binding.

All About Deferred Adjudication

All About Deferred Adjudication What is Adjudication?

Adjudication is a colloquial term, which refers to the formal legal process by which a judge or arbiter reviews evidence and testimonies including legal reasoning offered by litigants or opposing parties to come to a decision, which ultimately determines the distribution of rights and obligations for the parties involved. Adjudication is distinct from other justice-seeking or evidence-based resolution formats; in particular, the process is only used to solve the following types of disputes:

Disputes between private parties, such as individual citizens or corporations (who possess a legal personality)

Disputes that arise between public officials and private parties

Disputes between public bodies and public officials

Adjudication occurs when a natural person, typically someone empowered by an agency to formalize a binding decision, is given the task of examining evidence or facts to render a legally-acceptable and affirmed judgment. As a result of this process and the broad definition attached, adjudication may refer to a casual form of judging, such as in athletic competitions, where a body of judges adjudicate and awards scores to the competitors; or adjudication may  occur in business, where a qualified judge is called to examine the facts to resolve a dispute between two parties.

As stated earlier, a judge (instead of a jury) will typically settle disputes between parties in adjudication. Although the adjudication process is quicker and typically less expensive, the review of facts is generally thought to be less thorough and sympathetic when compared to a trial by jury.

In the legal sense, an adjudicator is not regarded as a mediatory, even though the two parties are required to come to terms or agree on a settlement to resolve a case. In the majority of situations, a mediator will help find a compromise between feuding parties, but they cannot force the parties to do so. In contrast, the legal adjudication process and the settlement it reaches, does require the parties involved to comply to the punishments or settlements outlined; the resolution the legal adjudication process reaches is legal binding.

What is Deferred Adjudication?

Using the above explanation in mind, deferred adjudication simply means that a final judgment in an adjudication hearing has been “put off” or deferred until a later time. Between the announcement of a deferred adjudication and the time when the final judgment is delivered, the accused individual or the party in question is awarded the opportunity to partake in efforts that will result in an expunging, from his or her personal records, of a guilty plea for the underlying infractions.

Deferred Adjudication is offered a number of individuals who have no prior arrests and have been accused of committing a small or minor crime. As oppose to serving a sentence or paying a fine, the deferred adjudication process will allow the individual to complete community service hours or educational classes, such as an anger management class for instance, to terminate the charges and the attached punishments.

As a result of this elimination, deferred adjudication is a plea bargain agreement between a defendant and the coordinating legal body. The final judgment is postponed or “deferred” until the end of the individual’s probation period. If the individual successfully completes the probation period, the charges are dropped.

In order to receive a deferred adjudication from a court system, a defendant is required to either enter a plea of guilty or a plea of no contest to their respective charges. In either setting, the defendant admits to the crime charged—a plea of no contest is more advantageous for it offers a degree of protection from subsequent civil charges that may be levied against the individual.

Although deferred adjudication, upon completing the required community service or classroom work, drops the accused’s charges, the individual’s original arrest record, as well as the record of the action of the court, remains unchanged.